Skip to content

If the CIA isn't behind HBO's "The Anarchists" and Anarchapulco then Why is my Expose Being Censored by CIA Google?

If the CIA isn't behind HBO's "The Anarchists" and Anarchapulco then Why is my Expose Being Censored by CIA Google?
Published:

Evidently, someone at CIA Anarchapulco e-mailed someone at CIA Google and told them to censor my article because CIA Google has de-indexed it from search results strengthening the case that Anarchapulco was/is a CIA operation to “steer and smear” the voluntaryist, peaceful anarchism and crypto-anarchism movements.

In the review of Episode Four of “The Anarchists,” I explain how control-of-perception is the most potent weapon in the US arsenal. The CIA’s control of the media came out in the Church Committee hearings of the 1970s, where it came out that the CIA had hundreds of reporters, editors and publishers on the payroll.

Internally the ability to play dozens of reporters, news outlets and NGOs simultaneously is known as The Mighty Wurlitzer or Wisner’s Wurlitzer after former CIA Deputy Director Frank Wisner coined the term.

The history of the program is detailed in the award-winning book: The Mighty Wurlitzer - How the CIA Played America by Hugh Wilford, which we include in our uncensorable flash drive of freedom: The Liberator.

In the case of Anarchapulco/ “The Anarchists,” the CIA has created a front group to “steer and smear” the voluntaryist / peaceful anarchism and crypto-anarchism movements for the reasons I outline in the review of Episode 1 of: “The Anarchists”

Blumhouse Media and HBO are two other “pipes” on the organ which are then amplified by the monopoly media outlets that trumpeted John Galton’s death as being related to “anarchy” and promoted the propaganda piece with reviews that mischaracterized what really happened: The Daily Beast, Wired, AP, Washington Times, The Daily Mail, etc.

Now CIA Google has gotten into the act. Since the name-of-the-game is to control perception widely than the biggest, tallest “Pipe” in the CIA’s Wurlitzer is obviously: Google.

One of the reasons that The Art of Liberty Foundation gets censored as much as we do is that we publish evidence of the CIA’s creation and control of Google on our uncensorable flash drive: The Liberator.

I will put some of the Liberator’s best evidence that Google is a CIA operation at the end of this post in this footnote to get to the point and details of the censorship of my article.1

If you search on SwissCows.ch, Yahoo.com, or Dogpile.com for the search terms: “the anarchists HBO episode 4 review,”. My article on Substack is the #1 search result.

If you search on CIA Google, the page/URL can’t be found.

It also can’t be found on page 2 of Google, Page 3 of Google, Page 4 of Google, or Page 5 of Google. We tried from different devices (tablets vs. PCs vs. phones) and different countries (Dominican Republic). We tested voice search vs. text. Interestingly it came up for my son at a college in VA, but he was the only one.

If you search for the exact title of the article on Swisscows.ch, Yahoo.com, or Dogpile.com, it is also the #1 result, as would be expected.

If you search for the exact title on CIA Google the page:

https://artofliberty.substack.com/p/hbos-the-anarchists-episode-4-propagand

(I have removed the last letter: “a” so Substack doesn’t format it into a preview where you can’t read the URL)

The page/URL can’t be found, BUT Google finds where the article is listed on the main page/index of our Substack: ArtOfLiberty.Substack.com. Google finds where we tweeted the article and where we syndicated the article on ArtOfLiberty.org.

It appears that someone shot over the specific link to the article to add to the blacklist, BUT Google is still indexing the title on other pages. Try it quickly before they turn it back on again if this article gets traction: Here are all the screenshots to prove it if that happens.

My Challenge to Critics of my Thesis - The One Question That No One Will Answer!

Until yesterday the overwhelming response that I had received was people agreeing with me. I had people contacting me from both the Acapulco community and former employees of Anarchapulco to offer me more evidence and clues! Evidently, a memo went out, and I got slammed on Facebook in a full-court press from friends and foes alike. The post currently has 170 comments and still growing… I was attacked by Larken Rose, John Bush, Jake Lee, Barry Cooper, Jack Lloyd and others. Some folks respectfully disagreed, which I don’t have a problem with. I posed the same question to almost every single person who disagreed, and not one single person would answer it:

End of Free Preview

What is behind the paywall this week:

Where to Find More Articles on Our Investigation

The Anarchists - Is HBO Trying to "Chump" Their Audience about Anarchy?
-The Anarchists exposes how the organized crime CIA & monopoly media control perception using propaganda, engineered "reality," and controlled opposition media to "steer and smear" political movements

The Anarchists - Episode 2 Review & Crowd Sourced Investigation Strikes Gold!: Witness: "[Anarchapulco] drugs came from the CIA"

HBO's The Anarchists - Episode 3 - Propaganda Breakdown and Backstory
-CIA "Easter Eggs," more subliminals and a mini-breakdown of the whole scam

HBO's The Anarchists - Episode 4 - Propaganda Breakdown - Are John Galton and Paul Propert Really Dead?
-10 Solid Reasons Why I Think the Murder Was Staged as Part of HBO/Scumhouse's "Reality" Show

Go paid at the $5 a month level, and we will send you both the PDF and e-Pub versions of “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! and a coupon code for 10% off anything in the Government-Scam.com/Store.

Go paid at the $50 a year level, and we will send you a free paperback edition of Etienne’s book “Government” - The Biggest Scam in History… Exposed! AND a 64GB Liberator flash drive if you live in the US. If you are international, we will give you a $10 credit towards shipping if you agree to pay the remainder.

Support us at the $250 Founding Member Level and get a signed high-resolution hardcover of “Government” + Liberator flash drive + Larken Rose’s The Most Dangerous Superstition + Art of Liberty Foundation Stickers delivered anywhere in the world. Our only option for signed copies besides catching Etienne @ an event.

The Question that None of My Critics will Answer…

What do YOU personally think the odds are that known serial propagandists would follow around a small group of people for four (4)! years and three (3) of that small group of people (all drug dealers at Anarchapulco!) end up dead? 1 in 1,000,000? 1 in 10,000,000? What is YOUR personal estimate?

I asked at least 10 of my critics what they personally thought the odds of that scenario were and not one single person would answer the question.

Why? Because if they answer low, they look like an idiot that doesn’t understand the basics of probability (or a controlled opposition shill…) I’ll leave it to the reader to sort out who is who.

OR if they admit that the actual odds are ASTRONOMICALLY against that scenario, then my thesis begins to make sense. Ask them yourselves and see if you can get an answer!

Note: Right before I hit publish, someone finally gave an estimate: Tim Picciott, the Liberty Advisor, an economist and CFP/CRPC, who agrees with much of my thesis but not that Henza, Lily and John are actors and/or staged death put the odds at 10,000,000 to 1.

More Random Evidence and Interesting Tidbits:

Drugs As Weapons Against Us Documentary Censored Off Bitchute.. Right After We Linked To It!

In the review of the 3rd Episode of HBO’s “The Anarchists,” I detail the established CIA tactic of dealing drugs into political movements. I link to the best book /documentary on the subject: Drugs as Weapons Against Us: The CIA’s Murderous Targeting of SDS, Panthers, Hendrix, Lennon, Cobain, Tupac and other Activists. The link I included to the documentary was a version that had been up on Bitchute for a months if not a year plus. It was taken down shortly after I posted the link. I think the CIA knows that most people aren’t going to read the book, BUT some folks might have watched a juicy documentary, so they had it taken down. You can buy the DVD directly from the author at the link above, and I understand it is free on Amazon Prime!

1

Here are some articles and evidence from: The Liberator

How the CIA Made Google by Nafeez Ahmed - Details the specific CIA-DoD programs (The Highland Forum, CIA-backed venture capital firm In-Q-Tel, others) that provided early funding to Google.

Research Proves Google Manipulates Millions to Favor Clinton - distinguished research psychologist Robert Epstein explains his 2016 study and reviews evidence that Google's search suggestions were biased in favor of Hillary Clinton. He estimated that biased search suggestions might have shifted as many as 3 million votes during that election.

Audit suggests Google favors a small number of major outlet By Nicholas Diakopoulos - 2019 study showing that Google News promotes a small cartel of other “news” organizations. Just 20 news sources account for more than half of article impressions. The top 20 percent of sources (136 of 678) accounted for 86 percent of article impressions. And the top three accounted for 23 percent: CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post.

How Google Interferes With Its Search Algorithms and Changes Your Results - The Wall Street Journal – Nov 18th 2019 by Kirsten Grind, Sam Schechner, Robert McMillan and John West -

Some findings:

• Google made algorithmic changes to its search results that favor big businesses over smaller ones, and in at least one case made changes on behalf of a major advertiser, eBay Inc., contrary to its public position that it never takes that type of action. The company also boosts some major websites, such as Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook Inc., according to people familiar with the matter.

• Google engineers regularly make behind-the-scenes adjustments to other information the company is increasingly layering on top of its basic search results. These features include auto-complete suggestions, boxes called “knowledge panels” and “featured snippets,” and news results, which aren’t subject to the same company policies limiting what engineers can remove or change.

• Despite publicly denying doing so, Google keeps blacklists to remove certain sites or prevent others from surfacing in certain types of results. These moves are separate from those that block sites as required by U.S. or foreign law, such as those featuring child abuse or with copyright infringement, and from changes designed to demote spam sites, which attempt to game the system to appear higher in results.

• In auto-complete, the feature that predicts search terms as the user types a query, Google’s engineers have created algorithms and blacklists to weed out more-incendiary suggestions for controversial subjects, such as abortion or immigration, in effect filtering out inflammatory results on high-profile topics.

More in Investigations

See all

More from Etienne de la Boetie2

See all